GamePress

Aversa vs Loki vs Camilla

Just asking people who at least likes one of em
Who do you like more, and why?

I'm posting the three below here, so you can comment/upvote on them specificly

(you can probably guess who I like the least)

Asked by Sir of Coffee2 months ago
Report

Answers

I think I like Camilla more. I can't stand Loki and Aversa was okay. They're not really that "story driven" as far as characters go, though, but Camilla and Aversa have some back sorry that explains just why they act the way they do. I don't really like how they act, but it is explained.

Report

by Deef 2 months ago

Well, my vote goes to Camilla just because I played her game (passed Birthright and stuck in conquest). But I really want IS to stop making more of her seasonal alts.
I think that Aversa might have better written and deep character but I never played that far through Awakening.
EDIT on the second thought, now that Sonya present, I will give my vote to her instead.

Report

IS has luckily been making more and more alts for non fates/awakening characters. They probably know that the effect wears off with each new alt
Thought the NY and summer alts of Camilla do show an aspect of her I like. She has this elegance about her that someone like Loki lacks.
Screw the spring alt though.

Yeah.. I kinda didn't put Sonya in because I knew she'd get many more votes too easily.

Report

Well, I would appreciate her summer alt if not for her art (it looks nothing like Camilla; her face, hair, art style), because she was unit capable of using magic and axe in her game. I agree on elegance point tho, IS could have shown her wrecked side tho (when she wanted to kill Corrin and kradlle him like a baby in Birthright), it would fit Halloween alt so much.
Still, there's just too many Camilla, Azura alts for me.
Sonya is definitely deserves those votes in my opinion, she is strong, seductive (sane, if compared to Camilla), strong and she is mage.

Report

Aversa is brown, shes also a canonical slut, so shes bad.
Loki literally fucks horses, so shes a no.
Camilla has no personality beyond "doting oneesan", so shes a no.

In fact, I don't think theres a single big titted FE girl thats worthwhile, because if you think about it, the bigger a girls tits, the further from her heart you are when you hug. A girl with a flatter chest holds you close to her heart when she hugs you.

Flat > Udder, prove me wrong.

Report

Nephenee. She works hard doing farm and ranch work on the country side, is strong enough to punch a hole through plate armorlike its nothing, and is self aware to the point of being self conscious about her speech.

Report

Aversa has an interesting enough backstory to not be entirely one-dimensional, but I'm not going to say she's high on my list of favorites.

Loki doesn't have much to her. She's a tactician (whose actual tactical work we've seen very little of), she's a trickster (something she's used multiple times, but none of her tricks have had any particularly lasting impact, that we've seen at least) and she may be a greater scope villain (but that's still only speculation). The last part is just blatant fanservice.

Camilla I love, though. She's honestly my favorite character of Fates, but unfortunately all her backstory and other traits were largely shoved aside for the sake of fanservice and poor writing direction. It's a shame people can't take more than 5 seconds to take a moment and actually look into her character and her horrific backstory instead of passing her off as yet another "thot" (fyi, I don't like the term myself. I'm simply using it to make a point).

Report